How Tariffs and Private Equity Are (Loosely) Connected
Two stories dominated my coffee news cycle this week. I found some interesting resonances between them.
Two big stories dominated coffee news this week.
First, tariffs—sort of.
By now, you’ve almost certainly heard the news that the Trump administration has implemented a series of tariffs against U.S. trading partners, implementing a 10% base rate for most countries and adding additional rates to countries like Vietnam, Indonesia, and Nicaragua.
If you’re a regular reader of this newsletter, you might have noticed that the places listed above all produce coffee. As you can probably guess, these tariffs have people in the coffee world in a tizzy, questioning what they could mean for pricing and how the industry will navigate trade at what is an already-volatile pricing moment.
The tariffs were set to go into effect Wednesday, but were quickly put on a 90-day hiatus due to public outcry, and after markets plummeted. (The stock market rebounded once Trump announced the tariffs would be paused, although it’s important to note that the 10% base rate still stands.)
I plan to report on this evolving issue more soon, so I don’t want to get too deep into the specifics yet, especially as the situation remains fluid and unpredictable. We’ve also published several tariff stories over at Fresh Cup, including a live tariff tracker made by my publisher, Garrett Oden, and a report from my colleague, Fionn Pooler, in which he talked to stakeholders across the coffee supply chain about how tariffs would impact their lives and businesses.
In the meantime, we’ve seen responses from organizations like the National Coffee Association asking the Trump administration to exempt coffee from tariffs, because we don’t produce enough coffee in the United States. (As Fionn’s article points out, we grow less than 1% of all coffee produced.) Still, I can’t help but feel frustrated to see tariffs get so much attention when coffee pricing has already been in crisis for years.
I wanted to mention tariffs because a) They’re a big deal that’s dominating the news cycle, and b) I think they’re sneakily tied into the second story that dominated my social media feed this past week:
Black & White Coffee Roasters was acquired by FairWave, a private equity-backed organization that has bought nearly a dozen coffee businesses since 2020.
I think it’s important to consider why private equity is obsessed with coffee.
This obsession started long ago, with the acquisition of massive, industry-transforming roasteries like Blue Bottle and Stumptown in the mid-2010s, and it has only picked up from there. PE entered the coffee chat around the time specialty coffee was making inroads in consumer habits. In 2015, the Specialty Coffee Association reported that specialty consumption comprised 55% of the U.S. coffee market.
I remember when these stories first came out. On the one hand, I felt proud of our industry. But I also worried it made us vulnerable to actors who would see specialty only as a market from which to extract value.
The argument for private equity in coffee is generally the same as in other industries: More money will allow these businesses to do more with their sourcing, scale up, and improve workers’ lives. However, we’ve seen very little evidence of the latter claim, at least in any long-term way—I don’t know of any baristas who are on the record as saying, “Since we were acquired, my life is way better!” or farmers who are finally being paid more. I would love for any PE firm to provide data or documentation showing how their money has improved things for the people on the ground (though I suspect that, if they had that data, it would already be splashed all over their company profiles).
If you want to learn more about these dynamics, my astute colleague Fionn Pooler wrote a three-part series on private equity in coffee. One thing he pointed out was how much PE seems willing to shed the talented people who made a business what it was. Companies like frozen coffee capsule producer Cometeer and oat milk brand Oatly essentially developed their reputations in the specialty world on the back of some of the industry’s most talented and trusted workers—many of whom were later let go as profits and growth didn’t hit expected targets.
However, Fionn also acknowledged the professionalization that private equity can provide, such as higher wages and schemes like 401(k)s and paid time off, which are benefits that are lacking in most other specialty coffee jobs.
I find private equity’s interest in coffee to be pretty suspect: Why are these firms so invested in an industry that (for better or for worse) prides itself on being, well, special? The rise of specialty coffee happened due to small, independent coffee shops working with small, single-family farms. So much of the appeal of specialty still comes from this premise: You’re getting single-lot coffees in shops and from roasters with a unique point of view. What makes a specialty experience is the confluence of all these factors.
Ultimately, to feign that a capital-driven business like a private equity firm would operate under any other pretense than making money is bizarre. It’s so weird to me how these firms instead lead with claims of benevolence, like they’re fooling anyone. Wouldn’t it be interesting if FairWave instead made a statement like, “Yeah, we’re just here to acquire companies, and people might get fired if our bet to acquire XYZ business doesn’t work out?”
The bottom line: I think people are right to distrust private equity in coffee—and to be upset when those fears are met with little more than dishonest, PR-polished answers.
These two news stories might seem loosely connected, but I think both deal with narrative spinning, and what kind of messaging we’re being given versus the truths we’ve collected and observed with our own senses. Both have revealing things to say about power structures, and about the regular people who are left behind, or whose livelihoods are crushed, in the process—treated as little more than collateral damage as capital marches on.
What were your thoughts about these two coffee stories? Share your thoughts in the comments—and let me know what other topics you’d like me to report on next.
Hi Ashley,
You are right on point. What's the ulterior motive of PE.
It's like B-corporation certification. Companies with assets (finances and people to do the administrative work) apply for B-corp and they accept almost anyone nowadays so it became completely meaningless. Why do they want B-corp in the first place? They want to create an image of being ethical and sustainable. greenwashing and social washing.
Companies entered specialty coffee and less dark roast and use PE to push small independent roasters and cafe's out of the market. They tell the investors (and maybe this was their initial aim) that they want to take on big established coffee roasters, but the reality is that the specialty sector where people are really willing to pay a higher price for quality isn't growing that much, so in reality they push out small business because they do dedicated advertising (yeah..let's put more cash in zuckerberg's pocket) and can operated without profit and even open new cafe's without profit...all whilst paying the farmers exactly what we all do, a premium (differential) for specialty grade.
Sorry to sound harsh, but consumers are enlarge ignorant. Also gen Z and the younger generation that should care about the planet. They fall en masse for the fake marketing of greenwashing and social washing.
In dutch I call this "Sjoemelkoffie" like what starbucks is doing with its Awitserland green coffee sourcing daugther bizz...making loads of profit there whilst not even physically moving coffee in Switserland. The intelectual property tric to roam of profits before they enter your home country where consumers pay taxes. For you and me it's perfectly clear that this is dishonest.
These dishonest companies are very active in the coffee subscription market in europe. How can you recongnize this sjoemelkoffie/dishonest coffee:
- UBO (ultimate beneficiary owner) of the company is not clear...it's for sure not coffee farmers
- A mirade of legal entities
- Prices are unrealistically low. A normal company cannot work like that
Those first two are relatively easy to check but even journalists will compile a list of ethical coffee businesses and include the sjoemelkoffie because they have such a compelling greenwashing social washing coffee washing story
Hey Ashley, thanks so much for sharing your thoughts. I've been thinking a lot about how these two stories are linked as well... Profitability is front and center, and while that is an important part of specialty coffee businesses it is not, and cannot, be the only thing or even the most important thing, I think.
True sustainability happens at the intersection of profit, planet, and people. None of those should suffer for the sake of another. It's kind of like what I tell my barista students -- a great barista can make quality beverages consistently and efficiently, and the goal is to balance all three of those at the same time.
I would love to see a PE firm that approaches a specialty coffee business from a perspective of true sustainability for future generations. Maybe I haven't done enough research, but I haven't really seen that beyond creating a more economically sustainable model. To me, that doesn't count unless it's also socially sustainable and environmentally sustainable.
I'm just riffin'. Hope this makes sense. Thanks for all you do! Love your work.